Categories
Uncategorized

Diebold machines flipped Obama and Hillary votes in NH

“Thus we can say with a high degree of certainty that there is a relationship between the counting method and the election results. The probability of the aforementioned discrepancies occurring by chance is less than 1 in 100 billion.” http://www.eurotrib.com/story/2008/1/12/191247/981 So the chances of rigging are 99.9999999%. Obama won, Hillary lost. How hard can it […]

“Thus we can say with a high degree of certainty that there is a relationship between the counting method and the election results. The probability of the aforementioned discrepancies occurring by chance is less than 1 in 100 billion.”

http://www.eurotrib.com/story/2008/1/12/191247/981

So the chances of rigging are 99.9999999%. Obama won, Hillary lost.

How hard can it be to write a freaking voting machine? And if you want accurate results…

JUST USE OPEN SOURCE!

What do you expect when you have private corporations with vested interests write closed systems?

4 years ago they were talking about this exact same thing, vote flipping. I won’t bother finding the links but there are all over the place. I don’t mean half-assed speculation either, there is good statistical evidence for this and proof it can be done.

The only good thing now is they found it before we got a new president, rather than months after he is already in office.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *